Saved
Hardware · Systems

Falcon 9 first-stage landing tests

Reusability wasn’t proven—it was cajoled, crash-landed, and patched together over sixteen flights.

Worth your time?3.5/5Yes.Study the whole thing.What works, what does not, who it is for ↓
10:41in productionCh. 1 · First descent/ 10:41 · ceiling 15 min
4 chapters · 10:41Ceiling 15:00

The brief is written and checked. The video joins this page when it is cut.4 chapters · 1 min read · 10:41 planned

Read the brief

The Falcon 9 first-stage landing tests were a series of controlled-descent flight tests conducted by SpaceX between 2013 and 2016. The program's objective was to reliably execute controlled re-entry, descent and landing (EDL) of the Falcon 9 first stage into Earth's atmosphere after the stage completes the boost phase of an orbital spaceflight. The first tests aimed to touch down vertically in the ocean at zero velocity. Later tests attempted to land the rocket precisely on an autonomous spaceport drone ship (a barge commissioned by SpaceX to provide a stable landing surface at sea) or at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1), a concrete pad at Cape Canaveral. The first ground landing at LZ-1 succeeded in December 2015, and the first landing at sea on a drone ship in April 2016. The second landed booster, B1021, was the first to fly again in March 2017, and was recovered a second time. The first landing test occurred in September 2013 on the sixth flight of a Falcon 9 and maiden launch of the v1.1 rocket version. From 2013 to 2016, sixteen test flights were conducted, six of which achieved a soft landing and recovery of the booster.

Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 1:08
    First descent

    The first test was a controlled-descent flight in September 2013—the sixth Falcon 9 mission and maiden flight of v1.1.

  2. 2:37
    From ocean to pad

    Early tests targeted zero-velocity ocean touchdowns; later ones aimed for precision landings on LZ-1 or drone ships.

  3. 4:15
    Two landings, two milestones

    December 2015 saw the first successful ground landing; April 2016 delivered the first sea landing on a drone ship.

  4. 6:13
    Six down, one up twice

    Six of sixteen tests achieved soft landing and recovery—and only one booster, B1021, flew again and landed twice.

1 more chapterFewer chapters
Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

3.5/ 5
What works
  • Vertical propulsive landing on land.
  • Vertical propulsive landing on drone ship.
  • Booster reflight and second recovery (B1021).
What does not
  • It does not prove reliability.
  • It does not establish low-cost or rapid-turnaround reuse.
  • It does not demonstrate success on first attempt.
Study it if
  • Launch vehicle designers
  • Space logistics planners
  • Reusable propulsion engineers
Skip it if
  • Commercial satellite operators
  • Policy makers assessing near-term cost reductions
  • General aerospace educators seeking textbook-ready case studies
Who should study it, and who should skipHide who it is for
The written brief1 min read

What it is and the problem it solves

A series of controlled-descent flight tests to land Falcon 9 first stages after orbital boost. It solved the problem of discarding multi-million-dollar hardware after one use.

How it works

The tests used controlled-descent flight to execute re-entry, descent and landing of the Falcon 9 first stage after orbital boost phase. Early tests targeted vertical ocean touchdown at zero velocity. Later tests aimed for precision landings on a concrete pad (LZ-1) or an autonomous drone ship at sea.

What works

Vertical propulsive landing on land succeeded in December 2015. Landing on a drone ship at sea succeeded in April 2016. Booster B1021 was reflown and recovered a second time.

What does not

Ten of sixteen test flights failed to achieve soft landing and recovery. The tests did not prove reliability: they proved possibility, with repeated failure built into the method.

What it changes

They changed the baseline assumption that orbital rocket stages must be expendable. They enabled reuse—B1021 flew twice—but did not demonstrate routine, low-cost, high-frequency turnaround.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you work in launch systems, reusable rocketry, or space logistics. The tests established that vertical propulsive landing of an orbital-class booster is operationally achievable—but only after sixteen flights, six soft landings, and two years of iteration.

Same field · Hardware4 of 251
9:27
Lidar1961Lidar began as Colidar: a satellite-tracking tool that measured distance by laser time-of-flight. It solved one problem well—precise, line-of-sight ranging—and nothing else. Its legacy is hardware lineage, not capability.
9:27
Liquid-propellant rocketLiquid-propellant rockets burn liquid fuel and oxidiser to generate controllable, high-specific-impulse thrust. They enable throttling, shutdown, restart, and mixture-ratio adjustment—capabilities critical for orbital insertion and landing. Their development began with Tsiolkovsky’s 1903 theory and Goddard’s 1926 flight. But their operational cost, infrastructure dependency, and handling hazards remain hard constraints.
9:14
CubeSatThe CubeSat is a mechanical and interface standard — not a satellite architecture. It enables interoperability at launch, not in orbit. Its value lies in constraint, not capability.
11:34
SpaceX Starship2005Starship is a two-stage, fully reusable, super heavy-lift launch vehicle developed by SpaceX. It is built and launched from Starbase in Texas. It is intended as the successor to Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. If completed as designed, it would be the first fully reusable orbital rocket. As of July 24, 2026, it had launched 13 times, with 8 successes and 5 failures. Both stages are powered by Raptor engines using liquid methane and liquid oxygen. Both stages are intended to return to the launch site and land vertically at the launch tower. The upper stage functions as a standalone spacecraft for crew and cargo. Missions beyond low Earth orbit require in-orbit refueling.
Up next in Technology

Floppy disk

IBM · 1964 · 9:22

IBM didn’t invent portable storage — it invented the first standard that made portability enforceable.

9:22